GLOBAL JEWISH CAPITAL IN THE U.S. AND AROUND THE WORLD

"These trends are clearly seen primarily in two major centres of business activity in the capitalist world - IN WESTERN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA, WHERE TO DATE ARE FOUND THE MOST POWERFUL FINANCIAL-INDUSTRIAL GROUPS OF THE JEWISH BOURGEOISIE. In Europe, this is the Rothschilds group, whose name is associated with the entire history of Zionism and in the U.S. – the relatively new Lazarov banking group: THESE ARE FIVE MAJOR INVESTMENT BANKING WALL STREET FIRMS ... forming the basis of two of the most significant Jewish monopoly groups" (the Limenov groups and Loeb - Bronfman – Beych groups)."... In the hands of the above-mentioned five major Jewish investment banking firms on Wall Street are always up to 23% of the shares of large industrial companies in the U.S.. SOMETIMES THIS FIGURE REACHES 40%. Representatives from these firms cover about 15% of directorships in 1000 various corporations in the country.
The influence of major Jewish capital in the economies of the capitalist countries is maintained not just BY ITS FIRM POSITIONS, BUT IN INDIVIDUAL STATES AND BY ITS LEADING POSITIONS IN THE SPHERE OF CREDIT-FINANCE AND TRADE, WHICH REMAIN TO THIS DAY, THE PRINCIPAL AND TRADITIONAL BUSINESS OF THE JEWISH BOURGEOISIE. Over the past decade, the financial sphere of influence of the bourgeoisie of Jewish descent has gone far beyond these areas and has spread to many sectors of material production - mining, oil and chemical industries, transportation, publishing, advertising and the newspaper business, enterprise culture and the media outlets. In recent years, Jewish finance capital in corporations, firms and companies in the military-industrial complex has played a more prominent role.
“….THEIR WEALTH, ORGANIZATION AND LEADING POSITION PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR UNLIMITED INFLUENCE IN DETERMINING U.S. POLICY." (V.I. Kiselev. Zionism in the imperialist system / / International Zionism: history and politics. M., 1977., P. 7-8,10).
"It is no exaggeration to say that the BRANCHING AROUND THE WHOLE WORLD and at the same time a strictly centralized system of organizations of International Zionism combined with a POWERFUL FINANCIAL-ECONOMIC BASIS in the face of a monopoly bourgeoisie of Jewish descent with a large, often DOMINANT INFLUENCE OVER THE MEDIA, CULTURE AND STATE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION APPARATUS of leading capitalist states, IS THE MAIN SOURCE OF STRENGTH AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ZIONIST INFLUENCE OVER POLICY of a number of leading capitalist states. To date, INTERNATIONAL ZIONISM by degree of the branching out of their organizations, their range of activities and international relations, the depth of penetration into the sphere of Jewish communities, as well as in different spheres of political, economic and social life in capitalist countries has no equal ... AMONG OTHER ORDERS OF WORLD REACTION " (ibid., p. 15).
"..." A Zionist organization... has the possibility and ability to achieve what is OUTSIDE THE AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION OF THE STATE, and in this lies the SUPREMACY OF A ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OVER THE STATE ... The state and the Zionist movement complement each other, need each other"... ZIONISTS HAVE DIRECTED THEIR STRENGTHS... ON A GLOBAL SCALE – TOWARDS THE CREATION OF A QUASI-INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS EDUCATION TO ENJOY THE RIGHTS OF SUPRANATIONAL (ABOVE-STATE) ORGANIZATIONS ... "(ibid., p. 73, 75).
"It becomes even more evident the unseemly role of those who encourage Israeli extremists - THE ROLE OF U.S. IMPERIALISM AND INTERNATIONAL ZIONISM AS AN INSTRUMENT OF THE AGGRESSIVE IMPERIALIST CIRCLES ... In many parts of the world, including Israel, the Zionist organizations and the Israeli government have become THE MAIN TOOLS OF POLITICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL STRUGGLE OF IMPERIALISM AGAINST SOCIALISM AND COMMUNISM, AGAINST THE SOCIALIST COUNTRIES AND ESPECIALLY AGAINST THE SOVIET UNION "(ibid.).
THE ROLE OF WORLD ZIONISM IS IN THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SOVIET UNION AND THE SOCIALIST CAMP.
“…. UP TO 80% OF AMERICAN AND INTERNATIONAL WESTERN MEDIA OUTLETS ARE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST CENTRES. In many countries, the bourgeois Zionist organizations have placed their own "cadres" and "sympathetic" into the central elements of the press, editorial radio, in television, film, science, art and literature. USING THESE POWERFUL LEVERS, THE ZIONISTS INFLUENCE PUBLIC OPINION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY PREACHING THEIR IDEAS, REMAIN SILENT OR DISTORT EVERYTHING THAT IS EVEN THE SLIGHTEST DEGREE AGAINST THEIR IDEOLOGY" (Ideology and practice of international Zionism., 1978, p. 97, 98).
"A SIGNIFICANT role for ZIONISM lies in the strategy of imperialism to create within the individual socialist countries - through the Zionist-minded elements, with the help of all sorts of revisionist and nationalistic concepts - ENCLAVES OF OPPOSITION to the people's system with the aim of eliminating it through a "SILENT COUNTER-REVOLUTION"... Unfolding the FRONT OF IDEOLOGICAL SABOTAGE with the aim of undermining the socialist society, BREAKING IT UP FROM WITHIN, Zionist organizations attracted ZIONIST intellectuals FOR THIS, COVERED BY A MASK OF "LIBERALS" AND "FIGHTERS FOR DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS" (ibid., p. 105).
"To strengthen political subversion against the socialist countries, international Zionism brought their own strong points closer to their borders. Such SUBVERSIVE CENTRES AND ORGANIZATIONS OF ZIONISM, with close ties to the intelligence services of the imperialist states, settled in West Berlin, Brussels, Paris, London and Vienna. All of them, coordinating with each other activities against the socialist countries, COLLECT AND HANDLE MATERIAL ... , ENGAGE IN IDEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL SABOTAGE, etc ... According to the London Sunday Telegraph, "TEL AVIV HAS BECOME KNOWN IN WORLD INTELLIGENCE AS A KIND OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETPLACE FOR INTELLIGENCE DATA", supplied by the Zionists who infiltrated the socialist countries" (ibid., p. 106).
"Evidence suggests that a typical example of the unity of racism and chauvinism is specifically Zionism, which CURRENTLY IS ASSIGNED THE ROLE OF THE GUNS OF WORLD REACTION ... Many people increasingly find clear the TRUE scale of the danger posed by the IDEOLOGY AND ACTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL ZIONISM FOR ALL PEACE-LOVING, DEMOCRATIC FORCES OF THE PLANET AND ITS FUTURE ... Its SPECIAL DANGER lies in the variety of forms and methods of struggle, and the ability to change them depending on the situation, in the POSSIBILITY OF CONCENTRATING ENORMOUS FORCES AND MEANS TO FIGHT AGAINST SOCIALISM" (ibid., p. 265).

ZIONIST COLLABORATION WITH THE GERMAN FASCISM

From the book: Yuri Ivanov. Caution: ZIONISM! M., Politizdat, 1969.
The third step was to obtain the support of fascists.
Zionist intelligence having made a few deep probes and found that the omens were favourable, in November 1934 Goldmann (a former staff adviser on Jewish affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Kaiser of Germany, a leader of the World Jewish Congress – note by Editor.) hastily left for Rome. A great deal depended on the outcome of his meeting with Mussolini. The fascist dictator's reaction to the Zionist project was a matter of great concern not only to Goldmann, but to all Zionist leaders, and they followed the mission of the former German diplomat with close attention.
Mussolini received Goldmann on November 13, 1934, and their thirty-minute talk passed in an atmosphere of good will and mutual understanding. Mussolini approved of the idea of founding a World Jewish Congress and promised his support. The Goldmann mission was a success and signified a great deal for him personally. On November 14, 1934, his name appeared for the first time in the biggest European newspapers next to the name of "one of the most powerful personalities of the Western World."
***
“Haganah” - the so-called armed forces of the Jewish settlers. One of the top commanders of the Haganah, as these detachments were called, was Feivel Polkes who was also the chief resident agent of the nazi Intelligence Service in Palestine and Syria. The following appeared on the pages of the West German Der Spiegel on December 19, 1966: "Agent Reichert of the German Information Bureau in Palestine was in contact with a leading functionary of a secret Zionist organisation which more than anything else (with the exception of the British Intelligence Service) captured the imagination of German Intelligence. This organisation was called Haganah. In the general headquarters of this secret army worked . . . Feivel Polkes. . . . He was in charge, according to von Mildenstein's successor as Chief of the Division for Jewish Affairs 11.112 of the intelligence head-quarters, Hagen, of the administration of the entire security apparatus of the Palestinian Jews" [28] (emphasis added—Y.I.).
While Feivel Polkes with his cutthroats ministered to nazi Germany's external "needs," Dr. Nossig, the same Dr. Nossig who in the reign of Wilhelm II upheld the project of settling the Jews in the Ottoman Empire outside of Palestine, was equally zealous in ministering to the "domestic needs" of the nazis. “Zionist leader, writer, sculptor and politician in whose Berlin office such prominent Zionists as Arthur Ruppin and Jacob Thon” had worked in their time, [29] Nossig together with the nazis designed the plan for destroying aged and needy German Jews. Nossig lived to the age of eighty, when, according to Moshe Sneh, he was executed by the fighters of the Warsaw ghetto who had found out about his crimes. Such was the degree of this prominent Zionist leader's loyalty to German imperialism, Sneh added. [30]

***
Goldmann, Polkes, Nossig, these direct links with fascism, were by no means exceptions. "Zionists," wrote Heinz Höhne, a German journalist, "viewed the consolidation of the nazis in Germany not as a national calamity, but as a unique historical opportunity for achieving their Zionist objectives." He asserted that "since the Zionists and the National Socialists had elevated race and nation to the scale of all things, it was inevitable that a common bridge should have appeared between them." [31]
US columnist Morris Cohen seconded this view, stressing that "Zionists fundamentally accept the racial ideology of these anti-Semites, but draw different conclusions. Instead of the Teuton, it is the Jew that is the pure or superior race." [32]
In 1933, the 238,000 Jews living in Palestine accounted for about 20 per cent of the country's total population. By 1936 their number had risen to 404,000, i.e., by more than 50 per cent. [33] And it would be naive to think that this considerable influx of newcomers was due to the "triumph" of Zionist ideas. It was fascist atrocities which forced Jews to seek a haven, and Palestine was merely one of the numerous regions where they found it. Forced to admit this fact, the Zionist Edelman wrote that the Jews went to Palestine “not with the express intention of setting up a Jewish national home there, but simply to save their lives.” [34]
At that period the so-called Palestine Office supported by the nazis was busy "selecting" refugees with the direct participation of the former Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol. In their book The Secret Roads, David and Jon Kimche wrote: "Jewish emissaries had not come to Nazi Germany to save German Jews. . . . They were looking for young men and women who wanted to go to Palestine and were prepared to pioneer, struggle and . . . fight for it." [35]
Quoting documentary evidence Heinz Höhne wrote: ". . . von Mildenstein, Chief of the Division for Jewish Affairs of the intelligence headquarters did all he could to assist Zionist organisations in the establishment of re-education camps where young Jews were trained for work in kibbutzes in Palestine. He carefully followed the activity of the Zionists, and ordered his Division to draft maps showing the progress of Zionism among German Jewry." [36]
These re-education camps were set up in nazi Germany following an agreement between Zionist emissaries and Adolf Eichmann. Disclosing Eichmann's attitude to the Zionists, Israeli journalist Hannah Arendt wrote that the latter "unlike the Assimilationists, whom he always despised, and unlike Orthodox Jews, who bored him, were 'idealists' like him." [37]
Zionists, as we know, have always favoured anti-Semitism in which they openly placed all their hopes for the future. Therefore the conclusion of a secret alliance between Zionism and fascism was not at all unnatural. Intent on achieving their goals, the Zionists reacted in a most peculiar fashion to the anti-Semitic orgies of the nazis. The British Zionist Lord Melchett wrote in a book published in 1937 that the persecution of the Jews in Germany was an obstacle to closer relations between the German and other European nations. To improve the situation Melchett recommended a mass and complete evacuation of German Jews to Palestine. His book can in no way be qualified as an indictment of nazi outrages. [38]
Chaim Weizmann (president of the World Zionist Organisation) viewed the developments in Germany with still greater equanimity and tolerance. In reply to a query of the Palestine Royal Commission about the possibility of transferring 6,000,000 West European Jews to Palestine, he said: "No, the old will go. . . . They are dust, economic and moral dust of the world. . . . Only the branch will remain."
Twenty-one years after the rout of nazi Germany, Zionist leaders let slip the causes of their loyal neutrality. "If we [Zionists—Y.I.] had regarded the saving of the maximum number of Jews as our basic task [emphasis added—Y.I.]," declared Eliezer Livneh, a prominent Zionist, "then we would have had to co-operate with the partisans. There were partisan bases in Poland, Lithuania, in the nazi-occupied parts of Russia, in Yugoslavia and later in Slovakia. If our main task [emphasis added—Y.I.] was to prevent the liquidation (of the Jews) and if we had entered into contact with the partisan bases, we could have saved many lives." [39]
Zionist leader Chaim Landau made public the views entertained on this issue by Yizchak Gruenbaum, who in the period of the fascist atrocities headed the Zionist “Salvation Committee”. "When I was asked," wrote Landau quoting Gruenbaum, "whether I would give money from the Karen Haechod [Zionist fund—Y.I.] to save the Jews of the Diaspora, I said 'no.' And now, too, I shall say 'no.' I consider that we have to withstand this wave, otherwise it will engulf us and push our Zionist activity into the background." [40]
The Zionists' policy towards the fascists was one of tacit consent (on the basis of the deal between the Zionist emissaries and Eichmann) and helped create the conditions which enabled the persecution of the Jews in Germany to attain the maximum possible proportions; this policy also consisted in the post-factum organisation of noisy protests to gain political and other capital.
Pointing to the main consequences of the "mutually highly satisfactory agreement between the Nazi authorities and the Jewish Agency for Palestine" Hannah Arendt writes: "The result was that in the thirties, when American Jewry took great pains to organise a boycott of German merchandise, Palestine, of all places, was swamped with all kinds of goods ‘made in Germany.'" [41]
David Flinker, an American journalist, noted on May 24, 1963, in the Tog Morgen Journal that "Ben-Gurion, as head of the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem in the thirties, concluded what was known as a transfer-deal with the Hitler government under which the assets of the Jews who had left the country were transferred in the form of German goods and thus prevented the institution of a boycott of the nazis. . . ." Moreover, writer Ben Hecht publicly accused Ben-Gurion of deliberately keeping silent in the period when the world public was already informed of the nazi atrocities.

In the last years of the Second World War, the public in all countries was widely informed about the nazi atrocities.
But the Zionists, accessories to numerous brutal crimes, remained in the shadows. Availing themselves of the opportunities and means provided by their allies, they evaded retribution leaving a maze of twisted paths behind them.
At that time the so-called Salvation Committee appointed by the Zionist Jewish Agency was functioning in Hungary. It was headed by one Rudolf Kastner who had maintained very close ties with Eichmann. "The greatest 'idealist' Eichmann ever encountered among the Jews," wrote Hannah Arendt, "was Dr. Rudolf Kastner . . . with whom he came to an agreement that he, Eichmann, would permit the 'illegal' departure of a few thousand Jews to Palestine (the trains were in fact guarded by German police) in exchange for 'quiet and order' in the camps [in Hungary—Y.I.] from which hundreds of thousands were shipped to Auschwitz." Hannah Arendt pointed out that “prominent Jews and members of the Zionist youth organisations who were saved by the agreement "were, in Eichmann's words, 'the best biological material'; Dr. Kastner, as Eichmann understood it, had sacrificed his fellow-Jews (half a million people-Y.I.) to his 'idea.' . . ." [51]
Arriving safely in Palestine, Dr. Kastner changed his name from Rudolf to Israel and became a prominent functionary of the Zionist Mapai Party headed by Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir and others. Later he was secretly liquidated by the Israeli political police [52] for admitting that the Hungarian Zionist centre had had a hand in the liquidation of hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews.
It was 1944. The German army was retreating under the blows of the Soviet troops. Its losses in men and materiel were telling heavily on Germany. To transfer its troops and concentrate them as swiftly as possible on the most vulnerable sectors of the Eastern Front the nazi command needed transport facilities—thousands of lorries.
At the beginning of May 1944, Eichmann was ordered to obtain 10,000 lorries through the Zionists for dispatch to the Eastern Front in exchange for a promise to liberate the Jews from German camps for shipment to Palestine. (By then the Jews comprised about 30 per cent of the total population of Palestine.)
Eichmann met with Joël Brandt, a Hungarian Zionist leader, who promptly communicated the nazi proposal to the Zionist Committee. The latter sent Brandt to Constantinople to discuss the matter with representatives of the Jewish Agency. [53]
The Zionist leaders, headed by Chaim Weizmann, unhesitatingly agreed to supply the nazi command of the Eastern Front with 10,000 lorries. [54] The Zionists had always regarded the Soviet Union and its armed forces as their direct enemy, and the decision was therefore a perfectly natural one for them to take.
Zionist politicians and dealers, who to this day claim to be the "defenders and benefactors" of Jews in all countries, suffered absolutely no remorse about the fact that besides Russians, Ukrainians, Byelorussians and men of all the other nationalities of the Soviet Union, there were Jewish soldiers, sailors, officers and generals fighting with the troops whose advance the nazis wanted to stop at any price. For all of them, whether members of the Communist Party or not, there was only one homeland—the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics—and they defended it with honour. That they might die in circumstances which the Zionists were ready and willing to create did not worry the latter in the slightest. Morris Ernst, a US journalist, was perfectly right when he wrote that the Zionists "are little concerned about human blood if it is not their own." [55]

V.I. LENIN ON GUERRILLA WARFARE

Despite all attempts by the bourgeois regimes to bring the labour movement to its knees, despite all their applied repression, workers and working people are rising up to fight for their rights.
In this issue we publish materials from Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, on the unfolding struggle.
Especially interesting are the letters of young readers of our newspapers, including political prisoners. Political prisoners from the "Odessa case" have not given up, have not broken, have not betrayed their communist beliefs. They, from the torture chambers continue their publicist, ideological, moral fight –- to defend their communist beliefs and ideals that call for working people not to give up and fight for the overthrow of the power of capital.
Noteworthy is the article of our reader Vikhrev about events in Primorye. And in this context I would like to learn from the experience of our Leninist party, the experience of the revolution of 1905-1907, when Lenin and the Bolsheviks paid much attention to the question of armed struggle in general and the partisan struggle in particular.
Analyzing the “Lessons of the Moscow Uprising” (works, vol.13, pp. 369-377, August 1906 - Russian) – of the December armed uprising in Moscow in 1905, - and the reasons for his defeat, Lenin noted that the general strike as an independent and main form of struggle, had outlived its usefulness, what with the spontaneous, irresistible force coming out of these narrow confines and producing the highest form of struggle, the uprising. "The strike grew into an uprising, especially under the pressure of the objective conditions" (p. 370). "From the strikes and demonstrations to individual barricades. From individual barricades to massive construction of barricades and street fighting with the army. Over the head of organizations, mass proletarian struggle crossed over from strike to uprising. In this, lies the greatest historic gain of the Russian Revolution reached by December 1905, the gain, bought, as in all the previous ones, at the price of enormous sacrifices "(p.370-371). "And now we must, finally, openly and publicly recognize the inadequacy of political strikes, to agitate among the broadest masses for armed insurrection ... To hide from the masses the need for a desperate, bloody, destructive war as the immediate task of impending action, means, to deceive oneself, and the people"(p.372). "... The inevitable wavering of troops, whatever the true people's movement, leads under the aggravation of the revolutionary struggle to a true struggle for winning over the troops. The Moscow uprising shows us exactly the most desperate, most furious fighting of reactionary power and the revolution for winning over the support of the army"(p. 372). Lenin, analyzing the causes of the defeat of the December armed uprising, reminds the revolutionaries of Marx's words, "who wrote that insurrection is an art and that the main rule of this art –is the desperately brave, final, decisive assault" (p.374). "We should ring all the bells on the need for a bold offensive and attack with weapons in hand, on the need for extermination with this, of the commanders, and the most energetic struggle for the wavering troops "(p.374). "Moscow - Lenin notes – put forth "new barricade tactics." These tactics were the tactics of guerrilla warfare. The organization, using such tactics would be mobile and very small detachments of tens, triples, or even two people "(p.374-375). Lenin went on to note that Moscow put forward a new tactic of guerrilla warfare, but did not develop it. "Vigilantes were insufficient in numbers, the mass of workers had not received the slogan of bold attacks and did not use it, the nature of guerrilla units was too fixed, their weapons and their methods inadequate, their ability to lead a crowd was almost undeveloped" (p.375). “Social-Democracy (Communists-FB) must recognize and adopt as their tactics this mass terror, of course, organizing and controlling it, subordinating it to the interests and conditions of the labour movement and the general revolutionary struggle ... "(p. 375). The heroic struggle of several thousand armed Moscow workers lasted 9 days. Tsarism sent troops into Moscow, many times higher in strength than the rebel forces, had used artillery against the barricade and drowned the uprising in blood. The Moscow Committee of Bolsheviks was arrested, and the rebels did not have a single centre, fought piecemeal and limited themselves to defence. This was the main source of weakness of the Moscow uprising and one of the reasons for his defeat (material from the History of the CPSU (b), OGIZ, Gospolitizdat, 1945, p. 79). Lenin, in the above work, notes that "military tactics depends on the level of military equipment - Engels chewed upon this truth and put it into the mouth of Marxists." (p.374). The Bolsheviks after the defeat of the Moscow uprising did not lost heart. They believed that there was an impending new wave of armed struggle and proposed to prepare for it more carefully, prepare weapons and to really confront the armed to the teeth, Tsar’s punitive forces, called on them step up the fight to win over the wavering troops, which mainly consisted of peasants dressed in soldiers' uniforms. "We can and must take advantage of improving technology, to teach the workers’ detachments to make bombs en-mass, to help them and our fighting squads to stock up explosives, fuses and automatic rifles. With the participation of the working masses in the urban uprising, with a mass attack on the enemy with a strong skillful fight for winning over the army, which will waver even more ..., ensuring the participation of the countryside in the common struggle - victory will be ours in the next all-Russian armed uprising" (p.376 ).
Lenin ends this work on an optimistic note with a deep faith in the creative forces of the revolutionary working class, - "Let us remember that the great mass struggle is nearing. This will be an armed uprising. It should be, if possible, at the same time. The masses must know that they are going on an armed, bloody, desperate struggle. Contempt for death must be spread among the masses and ensure victory. The attack on the enemy must be the most vigorous; attack and not defence should be the slogan of the masses, the ruthless extermination of the enemy – will be their task; the organization of the struggle will be developed mobile and flexible; the wavering elements among troops will be drawn into active struggle. The party of the politically conscious proletariat must fulfil its duty in this great struggle (p.376-377).
Lenin devoted questions on guerrilla action in his special work "The Guerrilla War" (PSS, v.14, p.1-12, September 1906). Speaking of forms of struggle, Lenin noted that, firstly, "Marxism is different from all the primitive forms of socialism in that it does not connect the movement of any one particular form of struggle. He recognizes a variety of forms of struggle, does not "invent" them, but merely summarizes, organizes, gives consciousness to those forms of struggle of the revolutionary classes, which arise of themselves in the course of the movement "(p. 1). "Marxism in this respect is learning, so to speak, from mass practice, far from the claims to teach the masses invented "forms of struggle" by armchair" systematists (p. 2).
"Secondly, Marxism demands an absolutely historical consideration of the question on forms of struggle" (p. 2). "At different stages of economic evolution, depending on various political, national, cultural, domestic conditions etc., various forms of struggle are put forward and become the principal forms of struggle, and in connection with this, in turn, secondary and less important forms of struggle are modified, "(p. 2).
"Armed struggle pursues two different objectives ... this struggle is aimed, firstly, to the murder of individuals, superiors and subordinates in the military and police - and secondly, to confiscate the funds from government and private entities. Confiscated funds go to the party, part of it goes towards the armament and preparation of the uprising, and part of it towards the maintenance of those leading the struggle characterized by us"(p. 4). "The worsening political crisis to the point of armed struggle and in particular the worsening poverty, hunger and unemployment in villages and towns have played a major role among the reasons for the described form of struggle" (p. 4). "The spreading of the "guerilla" struggle namely after December and its connection with the aggravation of not only the economic but also political crisis are obvious. Old Russian terrorism used to be the affair of the intellectual-conspirator, but now the guerrilla struggle is carried out, as a general rule, by a worker-fighter or simply an unemployed worker "(p.5-6).
"Guerrilla struggle is an inevitable form of struggle at a time when the mass movement is actually ready for an uprising, and when enter more or less large intervals between "major battles" in a civil war" (p.7).
"A Marxist stands on the class struggle, and not on social peace. In certain periods of acute economic and political crises, the class struggle develops to outright civil war, i.e. armed struggle between two sections of the people "(p.8). "In the era of civil war, the ideal party of the proletariat is a belligerent party "(p.8). And Lenin concludes: "It should learn to fight" (p.9).
“In such an era, in an era of nation-wide political strikes, the uprising cannot be moulded into the old form of individual acts, limited by very short time and very small areas. It is natural and inevitable that the revolt takes higher and more complex forms of a continual civil war covering the whole country, i.e. armed struggle between the two sections of the people "(p.11).
"Social-Democracy (communists -FB) must necessarily set its goal of the establishment of such organizations, which would be most able to lead the masses in these large-scale battles and, if possible, in small skirmishes. Social democracy (communists) in an era of intensified class struggle up and to civil war, should set itself the task of not only participation, but also the leadership role in this civil war. Social democracy (communists) must educate and prepare their organizations to ensure that they really act as a belligerent party, and not to miss a single opportunity to inflict damage on enemy forces" (p.11).
The Draft resolution “guerrilla fighting operations”, as proposed by the Bolsheviks to the IV (amalgamating) Congress of the RSDLP (Russian Social Democratic Labour Party) (April 1906) was written precisely in the Leninist revolutionary spirit. The Congress however, where the majority were Mensheviks had adopted the more subdued version of the Resolution. But on the V (London) RSDLP Congress (April-May 1907), when it became clear that the revolution had subsided, the Bolsheviks in the draft resolution to Congress “About guerrilla actions" wrote: "At the moment, in the absence of conditions for a mass revolutionary upheaval, guerrilla actions are undesirable and congress recommends an ideological struggle with them, and that it is also permissible under the conditions of mass revolutionary struggle, guerrilla performances can be carried out only at the initiative of local party committees, with the permission of the regional centres, and under their strict control. A system of party militia, which consists of military training for all party members within the existing party cells are a form of combat organizations, with the most appropriate task of training the militant vanguard of the proletariat for an armed uprising, (CPSU in Resolutions and Decisions of Congresses, Conferences and Central Committee Plenums, Moscow, Politizdat, 1983 , Volume 1, s.254-255).

A. MAYEVSKY

ON THE NATURE OF ZIONISM

By Lyubov PRIBYTKOV, Russia

I found on a website an article by Vladimir Andreyev entitled "The Truth about Zionism." I was happy, because that destructive role played by Zionism in the modern world, little is written about it by the Communists and this is unforgivable. And here we have the truth about Zionism. I thought, finally a Communist, a member of the RCWP (Russian Communist Workers’ Party), calling a spade a spade.
This is all the more necessary, because ZIONISM as the state ideology and policy of Israel, in equity should be again as in 1975, condemned by UN General Assembly as aggressive racism and a form of racial discrimination. For 60 years Israel has occupied Palestine and maintains a policy of state terrorism on the suffering of Arab land, exactly resembling Germany's fascism.
Although placing hopes on the UN is naive, because in 1991 it had abolished its decision. In recent decades, the credibility of this international organization has fallen sharply. The UN has become a handheld appliance for the U.S.A., the world imperialist gendarme. It got to the point that during the visit of the UN Secretary General to the Middle East on March 21, 2010, Israeli President Shimon Peres scolded Ban Ki-moon like a little boy for the allegedly loyal attitude of the UN towards "troublemaker" Iranian President Ahmadinejad ...
After reading the article my disappointment knew no bounds. Andreyev set out to - in whatever form he took to DEFEND ZIONISM. At first he warned readers not to believe the paraphrase from an article from the Large Soviet Encyclopedia, which says that "Zionism is a reactionary chauvinist ideology and policy of the Jewish bourgeoisie," and named "the characteristic features of Zionism as being militant chauvinism, racism, anti-Sovietism. He has reduced these assessments of Zionism to ordinary "horror stories", though they are the absolute truth.
Then he introduced us to the wise sayings of the first Israeli ambassador to the USSR, then Prime Minister Golda Meir. Do not forget to remember the good father of Zionism, Vladimir Jabotinsky, who Mussolini affectionately called a "Jewish fascist", and Ben Gurion dubbed him as "Vladimir Hitler." He sang the praises to the Israeli kibbutzim, “agricultural communes”, in which labour is perfectly organized, unlike the Soviet communes, in which "thick commies like to work less and get more ...”
The author even dragged Ber Borohov here, who headed in Poltava in the beginning of the XX century the Jewish "Marxist" organization Po'alei Zion "("Workforce"). And he dreamt, how the Jewish proletariat would move to an empty land (?) free from people, to create a "Jewish national enclave" and implement "socialist ideals". That’s why Zionism was initially alleged to be "socialist".
The magic of words played a cruel joke on the author. It saved him the necessity to analyze and dig to the bottom of the terrible phenomenon called "ZIONISM."
Hitler also headed the WORKER’S National Socialist Party. Was its program really desirable to the interests of the working class of Germany? Thus the Jewish "Bund" broke away from the RSDLP (Russian Social Democratic Labour Party) in early XX century, and the Poltavian “Po'alei Zion” bore no relation to Marxism and did not serve the interests of the working class. It would not hurt the author-"communist" to get acquainted with Lenin's assessment of the pro-Zionist position of the Bundists.
True, very often latter-day "communists" do not feel the need for studying dialectical materialist logic. They do not study the classics of Marxism. They say that "they are obsolete" to cover up their political ignorance and laziness of the mind. They restrict themselves to sketches of surface phenomena and do not examine events in the concrete historical context. The class approach is not considered a major methodological tool in understanding social phenomena.
Marx and Engels are sometimes quoted, but their outstanding discoveries - the materialist conception of history, are not understood. But they prefer, mainly what is in vogue, being the idealistic treatises of Western "thinkers" and the beautifully speaking speakers of bourgeois publicists. And they are even proud of such an eclectic mishmash of ideas in their heads.
So it turns out these articles, where instead of the truth about Zionism, are its solid apologetics. Andreev in the article refers to statements of "good" Zionists. And they do not bother to think about the thoughts of Lenin on the false and reactionary Zionist ideas about "special Jewish people" and "the need for Jewish separateness", which are harmful and contrary to the interests of the proletariat, including the Jewish proletariat. (PSS., v. 8, p. . 74).
In his work "Critical Remarks on the National Question", Lenin insisted on the need for "an uncompromising struggle against the contamination of the proletariat with bourgeois nationalism, even the most refined. (PSS., v. 24, pp. 124) He writes: "Marxism is irreconcilable with nationalism, be it the most "fair", "clean", refined and civilized. Marxism advances in place of nationalism - internationalism, the merging of all nations in higher unity "(p.131).
Not useful for the author also is the article by Karl Marx "On the Jewish Question", where indeed the social ESSENCE OF ZIONISM is revealed.
Arguing with Bruno Bauer on the question of emancipation of Jews in Germany, Karl Marx wrote: "What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, selfishness. What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Haggling. Who is his worldly God? Money. But in this case, the emancipation from haggling and money - hence, from practical, real Jewry - would be self-emancipation of our time. The organization of society, which would have the prerequisites of commercialism, and, consequently, the possibility of haggling eliminated – such organization of society would make the Jew impossible ... Thus, we find in Judaism a contemporary manifestation of the modern-day anti-social element, led to its current stage of historical development in which the Jews took in this bad direction, zealous participation. This element has reached a high stage of development at which it must necessarily disintegrate. The emancipation of the Jews in the endvalue is the emancipation of mankind from Jewry" (K. Marx and F. Engels, Collected Works, Vol. V. 1, pp. 408. Russian lang.)
Marx, one of the first, spoke of the significant impact of the Jews throughout the world. He cites the arguments of Bruno Bauer from the book "The Jewish question": "A Jew, who in Vienna is only tolerated, determines by his monetary authority, the fate of the whole empire. A Jew who may be disenfranchised in a small German state, decides the fate of Europe." And commenting on this passage with the words: "And this is not an isolated fact. The Jew emancipated himself in the Jewish manner, he emancipated himself not only because he had arrogated to himself the power of money, but also so that through him, MONEY has become a world power, and the practical Jewish spirit has become the practical spirit of Christian nations" (ibid., pp. 409).
Marx drew attention to the transformation of Judaism into the ideology of the Jewish bourgeoisie. "Jewishness could not develop further as a religion, because the world-view of practical demands, by its nature is limited and confined to a few strokes." "What is in itself the foundation of the Jewish religion? Practical need, egoism." "MONEY IS THE JEALOUS GOD OF ISRAEL, before whom there should be no other god. Money deprecates all the gods of Man from the heights, and turns them into commodities.” "The god of the Jews was made secular, became the world's god. The promissory note is the true god of the Jew. His god is just an illusory bill of exchange "(ibid., pp. 410).
In his work, "The Sacred Family, or Critique of Critical Criticism", Marx stresses that in the XIX century, the Jewish bourgeoisie began to occupy key positions in the capitalist world. "The fate of France is determined not in the offices of the Tuileries, not under the arches of the House of Peers, not even under the arches of the Chamber of Deputies, but on the Paris Stock Exchange. The real ministers are not Guizot and Gishatel, but Rothschild, Fould and other bankers. They control the Ministry and the Ministry is concerned about only those people who are loyal to the regime and those who benefit by it running in elections."
People would be better to understand state bodies of power do not have the reins of power in capitalist countries. True power is not with the politicians, but with CAPITAL. The capitalist buys the politicians in the same way as journalists and lawyers, villas on the Mediterranean coast or fashionable European yacht clubs are bought...
Of course, not every person finds it so easy to understand what Zionism really is. Under the conditions of imperialist globalization, international Jewish capital holds in its hands not only most of the transnational corporations, but most of the media. Any criticism of the ideology of Zionism and Zionist policy qualifies as ANTI-SEMITISM.
Fear of possible accusations of anti-Semitism makes even the other "bashful" (or cowardly) communist leaders say that the aggressive policies of Israel against the Palestinian Arab people, reminiscent of a genocide – is a topic which few Russian citizens (or British ones –K.C.) believe to be vibrant." When it comes to citizens-philistines, what can be taken from them? Besides their own stomachs, nothing ever interests them.
If the GENOCIDE which the Israeli racists have been subjecting the indigenous population of Palestine to for the past 60 years is not perceived by the Communists as their pain, then how can they be Communists. Communists – are internationalists.
Do we really not have the highest example of proletarian internationalism? The founder of the International Workingmen's Association, Karl Marx, held under the scrutiny the revolutionary situation in France in 1848 and kept in touch with the Paris Commune in 1871. After its defeat, it was at his house that many Communards found shelter.
For many years he had connections with the Russian revolutionaries Herman Lopatin and Vera Zasulich. He followed articles by Chernyshevsky and Flerovsky. In 1879 he intently studied Narodnik Danielson’s report sent to him on Russian financial policy for fifteen years. In his personal library were 115 titles of Russian books. Herzen read "Prisons and exile” in Russian in the original. He did not consider Russia to be "far far away" country ...
It was not from the Communist position, but an ordinary common sense position that made even former U.S. President Jimmy Carter describe Israel's policies as an "APARTHEID system, where two peoples occupy a land, but are separated from each other, and where the Israelis completely dominate and suppress by violence, depriving Palestinians of their basic human rights.”
Zionism is a terrible destructive force. In it are all the dogmas - false, unfounded and reactionary.
Who sees the “inextricable link of the Jews throughout the world"? None. Jews living in Russia, speak in Russian, many do not know any Hebrew or Yiddish. Jews in the U.S. are Americans. They speak English. French Jews do not utter a word of Hebrew. Assimilation has done its work. The Jews have no common territory, or single language.
Who today in his right mind accepts that "all Jews are brothers?” All Jews who are capitalists are enemies of the Jewish working people, like capitalists of any nationality are enemies of working people throughout the world. And this the ABC of Marxism.
Who, except the Zionists can accept the idea that Jews have some special "historical rights" to the "land of the Jewish ancestors? Yes, 700 years BC, that is almost 3,000 years ago there was a small kingdom of Judah, which then disappeared ... And now, when so much water has flowed, is there an Arab who has reconciled with the fact that he was forced to flee from the land where his ancestors lived, where he was born and raised?
So, what is Zionism? In the words of a Swedish journalist, a former Moroccan officer, Ahmed Rami - the voice of millions of Muslims all over the world. "ZIONISM is racism ... It is COLONIALISM ... It is IMPERIALISM ... It is the policy of repression and arrogance, as Zionist Israel has systematically violated all the principles and resolutions of the UN ... Zionism in its practice is strikingly similar to APARTHEID "... (Http://radioislam.org/russ/rami/5.htm)
Communists have nothing against this assessment, though Ahmed Rami is far from the ideas of communism. He did not understand any of Marxism, nor the socialist revolution of 1917 in Russia.
The leader of theoretical and practical Zionism, Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky's position of racism and colonialism openly deemed it NECESSARY to create a "national home" for Jews in Zion. He devoted his whole life to the development of Zionism, its defence and implementation. He did not accept the revolution in Russia in 1917. He advocated the "private economy", "private initiative” and private property. He rejected the class struggle, appealing for class peace and harmony. He believed the worker and the entrepreneur play the same role in the development of society. Whoever fights against private capital, is an enemy of the nation. He categorically disagreed with the slogan of the Communists - "Workers of all countries, unite!" The national was above the class.
He traveled to dozens of countries. In Russia and Poland, America and Germany, Britain and France - everywhere he campaigned passionately for Jews to leave everything and go to the "ancestral homeland". On the planet, everyone, Jews and non-Jews should understand that Eretz Yisrael (Israel) should be a Jewish state. The idea of a "Jewish majority" in the Promised Land was the motive of his life.
He preached the dogma - "EVERYTHING IS MINE", not agreeing even to admit that Arabs belong to at least three-quarters of the earth. "The Arabs must accept the situation as it is: the territory of Eretz Israel on both sides of the Jordan is intended for the Jewish state with a Jewish majority" - he said. (Joseph Nedava. Vladimir Jabotinsky: Milestones in life. Per. In Hebrew. Rostov-on-Don. 1998).
Back in 1908, he wrote that the creation of a Jewish state is the COLONIZATION of Arab lands. And it will lead to antagonism with the locals. History shows that the colonialists have never been met with open arms. The natives fiercely resisted in America, and will resist here. We must prepare for this. "Our country will be freed only by the sword" - he said.
The racist attitude of modern Israel is here in the words of Jabotinsky: "The settlement can only develop with the use of force, independent of the local population, protected by an iron wall that local people can not break ... We should not be afraid of the possibility that 900,000 people will leave the country "
Already in 1919 he created the organization of Jewish immigrants "Khagani" to "ensure the protection of settlers from the arbitrariness of the natives," as he called the indigenous Palestinian Arabs.
Later, speaking to young “Beitar”nationalists, he urged them to be "relentless", sung the praises of the "power of the fist" stood for "military training". "Learning to shoot" - he believed was a historical necessity. And did not cease to rejoice that he had saved the youth from the "red plague".
Later, out of the ranks of "Betar", the brainchild of Jabotinsky, rose bandit groups Etzel and Lehi, which after the adoption by the UN of the fateful decision to create the Jewish state of Israel in December 1947, began by terror to implement it.
They, 1 April 1948, in the village of Dir Yassin, massacred 245 unarmed Palestinians - men, women and children. The bodies were taken to a quarry and burned. Similar atrocities were committed in other towns. In 1948 alone, the Zionists had killed 100,000 Palestinians, both inside the country and abroad. The strangulation of the indigenous population of Gaza by continuing bombardments, blockades and starvation is still ongoing.
I do not know whether there was a Jewish Holocaust, but the Arabic holocaust today is there to see.
The ideas MILITARISM have become the driving spring of the aggressive policies of Israel. And terror has become its state policy.
The ideology and politics of Zionism naturally gives rise not only among Arabs but also among all freedom-loving humanity a feeling of protest and hatred of Israel, the occupiers and invaders.
Unfortunately, there is still no force that would be able to destroy Israeli fascism, as did the Red Army in World War II in the fight against German fascism. The Arab world is split. The international communist and workers' movement is riddled by opportunism and appeasement. There is no Communist International. The Communist Party of Israel is silent. Critical remarks by sane Jewish intellectuals in Europe and America in addressing Israeli barbarism are heard only neighbours on the couch by the TV ...
The military and political power of the Israeli and international Zionism can be withstood only by military and political force. Under the domination of the global imperialism, the only hope is for a global, well organized, national liberation and communist protest. The victory of the people in the liberation struggle in South Africa and the collapse of the apartheid regime inspires faith in the victory of the Palestinian people in the Middle East.
Lyubov PRIBYTKOVA, from Irkutsk, Russia
March 2010

ZIONISM - THE STATE IDEOLOGY OF THE RULING CLASS OF IMPERIALIST USA

Information message



In Calcutta, India, 27 - 29 November 2007 there took place an Anti-imperialistist International Conference on the subject: "Against imperialism, zionism, globalisation and imperialist occupation".

In the Conferences took part delegates from Russia, USA, Canada, Germany, France, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bahrain, Turkey, as well as more than 1500 delegates from different regions of India. The Organizer of the Conferences was the All India Anti-Imperialist Forum. A large many-thousand strong protest rally took place on the first day of the functioning of the Forum with the participation of the delegates of the conference and the population of Calcutta, ending with a mass-meeting with appearance on it of delegates of the Conference. In the Conference, took part General Secretary CC AUCPB N.A.ANDREEVA, who spoke on the subjects "Zionism - the state ideology of the ruling class of imperialist USA" with two reports. The First report was on the subject - "The Middle EAST - an arena of conflict between imperialism and the national-liberation movement". The Second report was on the subject - "Who rules America today?" On November 30, N.A.ANDREEVA spoke to a large audience in the Assembly hall in one of the universities in Calcutta.

Information bureau of the CC AUCPB, December 8 2007


ZIONISM - IS THE STATE IDEOLOGY OF THE RULING CLASS OF IMPERIALIST USA

PART.1 THE MIDDLE EAST - an arena of conflict between imperialism and the national-liberation movement

"Imperialism is the progressive oppression of nations of the world by the great powers, is the epoch of wars between them for expansion and strengthening of oppression over nations, the epoch of the defrauding the public masses by hypocritical social-patriots, i.e. people, which under the pretext of "freedom of nations", "the right of a nation to self-determination" and "defence of the fatherland" justify and defend oppression of the majority of the nations of the world by the great powers" – that is how leader of the world proletariat V.I.LENIN characterized imperialism at the start of the XX century (Vol.27,p.63, Russian).
This Leninist definition of imperialism remains actual to this day, when world imperialism has entered into a phase of a system civilization crisis, comprising of - a crisis of the world economy, which is accompanied by a global political crisis with deepening instability of the existing organization of society and weakening of international political structures (an example is the UN Organisation), an ecological crisis as a result of the predatory use of natural resources, a crisis to human personality, a spiritual crisis, a crisis of the consciousness which in turn brings about the degeneration of a person as an individual, the crown of nature.
The state of the imperialist system as a whole is well examined by an analysis of the real state of the USA, the essence of US foreign policy conducted and real relations with their own "friends" of this leading imperialist world power.
By figurative expression of one leading economic strategist of the West, a leader of the world economy of imperialism, – the economy of the US can now be compared to an Egyptian pyramid, turned over by 180 degrees and standing on its "head" with the base of the pyramid facing upwards (an upside down pyramid). This more unstable design remains in relative balance due to an ensemble of artificial, miscellaneous kinds of temporary props, which may fall away from the pyramid at any time. One of such props is that a big part of the reserves of convertible currency worldwide consists of paper dollars (provided by gold reserves of the USA less than 10%) and American bons. So the majority of imperialist states have to support the dollar. Additionally, contracts and trading on the majority of the world exchanges are conducted in dollars. However, one may consider that one of the props of the American economic pyramid has already burst: one of five of the largest oil exchanges (NEW YORK, London, Singapore and Tokyo), and the Iranian one since May 2006 has been realizing the sale in Euros only. Contractually Japan pays Iran in its national currency. At a given moment Iran will sell already more than 70% gained by it oil-products in their raw state to countries which do not fall into the dollar zone, that is indicative of a reduction of the deliveries of Iranian oil to countries, where US currency has circulation.
The USA today has the largest state debt, amounting to hundreds of billions of Euro (in 2006 it was 200 billion Euro). The US is neither capable of returning, nor servicing its debt in the plan of the near future since at the base of the crisis of the economic system of the USA lies not simply a parasitic, but a drug-addiction like way of existence of the economy and society, when the only form of survival is by monetary and credit emission provided with no backup.
The USA is -
- A country-usurer, which the population lives largely on the backs of gambling and speculating on the exchanges;
- No 1 state terrorist , organizing terrorist acts even in countries of their own "friends" – in countries of the elite “Great 7”;
- a country, initiating all over the world a state of constant tension and frailty of existing peacetime;
- a country, unleashing to everyone its most populist and demagogic image "democracy" and its own understanding of "human rights".
The IMF confirms the presence of a system crisis of imperialism and forecasts the deterioration of the condition of the global economy. In the opinion of IMF, in 2007, the global increase in GDP will form only 5,2%, in following year - 4,8%. Such a forecast was discovered by the IMF in October 2007. The head of the department of the studies of the IMF Simon Johnson, having named the reasons for the deterioration of the state of the world economy, defined as the main threat - the continuation of the instability of the financial markets and the possibility of the reduction in the value of assets, including (but not only) price falls in the housing market. Besides, Simon noted, "We are talking here about a loss of confidence (in the US), which can have much more serious consequences for economic activity, than we expect". The August problems on the US mortgage lending market of were transformed into a global crisis of liquidity, which neither Europe escaped. The Central Banks of the world were able to stop its spreading by their own large-scale infusion, however themselves the US has not recovered from the disease. The IMF forecasts the leading world economy (the US) this year to be the slowest growing GDP for the past 5 years - at a rate of 1,9%.
And, as always, imperialism searches for its next salvation in the organizing of wars, having directed now their own surges on the countries of the MIDDLE EAST.
The geo-strategic position of the MIDDLE EAST, the presence of rich oilfields (first place in the world occupies Saudi Arabia with 35 billion tons, then Iraq -17 billion tons, and Iran) have always attracted the attention of leading imperialist countries. After the Second World War the region was transformed into complex node of many contradictions, an arena of confrontation between imperialism and the national-liberation movement of peoples of the Arab world.
In its fight against the national-liberation movement, imperialism actively uses the state of Israel (created in 1948), which in breach and ignoring Resolutions of the UN General Assembly, began the seizure of the whole of Palestine. As a result of the Arab-Israel war in1948 – 1949, Tele-Aviv had occupied most of the lands intended for building an Arab state and the west part Jerusalem, which on decision of the General Assembly of the UN was to become an international zone. The Palestinian problem to this day remains a fundamentally unsolved question of the Middle East and very heavily promoted by the USA. The main purpose of USA in regulating the problem, it sees in the creation of a regional community, satisfying at all points, namely America. The response of the revolutionary movement HAMAS to the American so-called "Roadmap" plan, proposed in 2003, was unambiguous: "We shall not, neither as a whole, nor on separate points recognize this document, and consider it as a secret collusion against Palestinian people. This plan is no better than previous plans and agreements, directed mainly towards the security and protection of Israel on the backs of the security of Palestine".
The realization of the American plan "Middle East 2003", by which a change of the political regime in Iraq was expected, brought about armed aggression by the USA against Iraq in March 2003, the destruction of Iraq and a mass refugee crisis in nearby countries – of more than 4 million people (the population of Iraq before the US invasion was 22 million).
"After what has occurred in Iraq, everyone began fiercely hating the Americans " - declared the president of the Arab Republic of Egypt, H.MUBARAK in an interview to French newspaper "Monde". "The promised democracy turned into terror, which pursues us on the streets, in our homes and mosques, freedom – by colonial dependence, dignity - by insult" - declared by a leader of one of the central mosques in Baghdad. According to one Iraqi teacher "Bush’s policy on Iraq has failed. The USA are the main cause of the destruction of our country, and sufferings of its people." Nowadays the unemployment rate in the country is 50% of the able population, 4 million are undernourished and are underfed. There are two wars going on in Iraq now: one against the US occupation, the other – a civil war, between different confessional groups, mainly between Sunnis and Shiites.
The War against Iraq has shown that the USA have stated their own claim to individual leadership, for the sake of achievement of which America will be capable to go on any adventures and take any risks. This was said in Bush’s speech in the US Congress on January 21 2004, in which he declared that the USA will not hesitate and ask permission and support from other countries, when the business concerns US national interests. America is ready to act alone, without considering anyone or anything. This position is the state position and the president is not intending to depart from this position.
Having smashed Iraq, the USA have gained a certain temporary injection for its slowing rate of growth of the economy on account of the Iraqi oil, and have reduced its dependency on Saudi oil and created an additional lever of pressure on the states of Western Europe, Japan and China, dependent on deliveries of Arab oil. Having solved partly the problems of energy resources for its own economy, the USA have vastly lost in another - in a loss of confidence in itself on behalf of other states (this concerns Great Britain, which supported the USA in its war against Iraq). Today in Iraq there are 162 thousand US soldiers plus 11,5 thousand military personnel of other countries of the coalition. During the 3 years of war, the US has got from Iraq more than 3 thousand coffins.
After destroying Iraq, on the part of USA the Islamic Republic of Iran is now being subjected to barbaric attacks, occupying a very profitable geo-strategic position in the Middle East, Central and South Asia also declared a US zone of their own vitally important national interests, allowing actively to influence these regions. The seizure of Iranian oil will allow the US to solve the problem of its own energy security. One of the pretexts to start a war against Iran is that from the standpoint of the US, Iran presents a real threat to Israel (which the US have an obligation in the field of security), as well as that Iran, ostensibly, is busy building its own nuclear weapons.
The Islamic Republic of Iran at the head of which stands president Ahmedinezhad at present is a leader of the national-liberation struggle of the Muslim world against US imperialism in the first place, confronting the military, economic and cultural aggression of western imperialism with its market (in-essence usurious) economy. We shall note that the Islamic doctrine considers usury as one of the most serious crimes before Allah. Religious values today in the Islamic world are a political force, forming a certain lifestyle, a common culture and world outlook.
Iran sharply denounces the unleashed to the whole world by the USA western liberal-democratic values and the market as such, considering it as variety of gambling, of which there must not be a place in a true Islamic society.
King Abdalle ben Hussain of Jordan remains in a conservative pro-American position. He does not intend to move from the political policy, bequeathed by his father. This means, by his statement, "close co-operation with Washington in all spheres".
The absolute monarchy in Saudi Arabia is being transformed into a constitutional monarchy. Officially this state formally rejected in its time the idea of using force against Iraq without sanction of the UN Security Council and therefore it is not worth over estimating the toughness of the US-Saudi military partnership.
The European community of nuclear powers together with the US are undertaking titanic efforts for unleashing a war against Iran under the farfetched and false pretext - "not to allow the uncontrolled proliferation of nuclear weapons", falsely accusing Iran of developing nuclear weapons. Indeed Iran carries out research- development on obtaining nuclear fuel for building their own nuclear power stations. In the opinion of Fidel Castro, "Nobody must have the right to produce nuclear weapons, and more so to have a privileged right, obtruded by imperialism to install its hegemonic rule and deprive countries of the third world natural resources and raw materials.
We shall defend to the last on all tribunes of the world, the right for people to produce nuclear fuel, and to defend this right without any fear and awe".
In the Middle East, in this region of the world Israel has nuclear weapons obtained from the USA as far back as the 1950-s), along with Pakistan and India.
But the essence of the question is about a preemptive strike on Iran on the part of USA, as we see, not in development, of ostensibly, an atomic weapon, but in possession by Iran of one of the richest oilfields in the worlds. The same parcel, as in respect of Iraq, destroyed by American bombing for a month.
America exports oil, in which it feels a sharp lack of, which is a reason for racking up the price of oil on the world exchanges. Today the price of oil does not comply with any law on supply and demand of oil. This price complies with other factors, and namely its shortage in the face of rising extreme demand and the enormous extravagance of the consumers of the rich countries. This price has a no relations to some economic law. In the coming year, demand for oil will increase by another 2 million barrels a days. In the coming year the demand will be for more than 84 million barrels a day. The USA, the main territory of the empire, uses 8,6 million barrels of fuel at day(!).
To seize the rich oil-bearing region of Iran after the gangster-style hold up in Iraq, the USA long ago in readiness designed by Martin Indic in 1999 (then assistant state secretary of the US) a strategic project under name of "Double Attack". This strategic project comprises of a simultaneous encirclement, isolation and military defeat Iraq and Iran. The scheme of one of the versions of this plan was already marketed during the invasion by the USA into Afghanistan and Iraq. For the past years the Americans have taken the Iranian upland "in parentheses": from the west – US occupied Iraq, from the east – a puppet regime in Afghanistan, for which Kabul looks after the marines of the USA and which has some of its mercenary army, capable of providing a staging area for the deployment of force against Iran on "eastern front".
The CIA (notwithstanding the extreme unwillingness of the president of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf to be involved in American adventures even at the level of the obligatory fight against theTaliban) has managed to create an anti-Iranian terrorist group in Beludzhistane - "Dzhund Allah", - actively carrying out raids deep into Iranian territory ambushing border and police patrols, murdering officials etc. (all these acts have been documented on video cassette, like the Chechen fighters had recently being doing - for the purpose of reporting to their US sponsor).
From the western side, relying on Northern Iraq, practically torn away from Baghdad under the illegal political formation of "autonomous Kurdistan", the yanks have managed to unleash an underground guerrilla war of Kurdish fighters on Iranian territory. The presence of a Kurdish president in Baghdad must by American thinking guarantee them from a contest by the Iraqi side to the legality of such an administrative approach to the territory of a formally sovereign country (Iraq).
The main achievement of the Americans in the encirclement of Iran – is penetration of them into post-Soviet territory: the yanks now have military bases in Kirgizia and Tadzhikistan (former Soviet republics), the progressing destabilization of the South Caucasus, where Georgia plays the role of the rightless and warring satellite of the USA, and the USA is wresting concession after concession from out of Azerbaijan. All this creates a very complex geo-strategic situation for the regime of Azhmedinezhada.
Here is also another thing that needs to be added to what has been said: – the persistent urging on the part of USA of Saudi Arabia and Arab governments tied into it to participate in confrontations against the Iranians, the concentration of undersea and surface missile power in the Indian ocean, and military bases on Diego-Garcia.
From all that has been said follows one conclusion:
The entire policy of the USA in the Middle East over the past few years aims in the first place to destroy the Islamic (national-liberation) revolution and destroy the states of ayatollah for the sake of seizing Iranian oil. As stated above, this question was long ago put on the agenda of US policy long before, the notorious question appeared "about the possibility of the appearance of an atomic bomb in Iran". In other words, the “care" by the USA concerning Iran carries a deep civilisation and geo-political nature, not depending on the state of affairs. All the rest, carried out for justification of their own claim to Arab oil, is part of the disinformation action, which must "without fail " prepare world public opinion in favour of a war unleashed by the US against Iran.
In the events unfurling on the Iranian plateau, the constant crafty rivalry of Great Britain with the USA is seen as a main geo-political acting person, who promoted the decay of the British colonial empire after the ending of the Second World War. The actions of the USA in that length of time were directed at removing the British from the traditional regions of their colonial presence (from their former colonies), to overthrow the ruling aristocratic (monarchist) regimes there belonging to the world "Anglophile" parties and replacing them with pro-American ones, in which young officers and the nationalist bourgeoisie played the leading role.
Iran under Pahlavi assisted American strengthening in the Middle East, was the closest partner to Israel, which, we shall remind you, appeared despite the reluctance of British imperial strategists, always occupied a hostile position in respect of the Arab states of the Gulf, and still kept its orientation towards London.
The Islamic revolution, which took place with the support of Britain and France, installed a theocratic regime in Iran, having restored inter-elite contacts with the British establishment. Since then, the USA have set course for a tough confrontation with Iran.
Today the USA, residing in a deep system crisis, sharply needs a world military conflict, even up to the extent of the organization of a third world war, not excluding the use tactical nuclear weapons (of course, only from their side). Considering the experience and character of conducting US foreign policy, one can consider as wholly real that the Pentagon will try to reduce to minimum its direct involvement in the conflict (wage war using someone else’s hand and their own money). The aim of the USA – is to cause maximum chaos on the territory of the OLD WORLD, to provoke a war of everyone against everyone along lines of previous historic scenarios, in which USA would carry out the role of the arbitrator, taking part in the final stages (when dividing up the “loot”).
Two countries - Iran and Russia – are, in the modern political situation, a "restraining" factor since, unlike all the rest of the imperialist states, they are not interested in world convulsions: the balance of the political resource and internal problems in Russia and in Iran now do not favour stability of these countries (there is enough heightened social tension and Russia as well as in Iran).
Other imperialist states are not averse to using the crisis situation in the world for solving their own geo-political problems and altering their own status.
Japan is hoping for a collapse of the modern international system of agreements and obligations and is trying to return to itself the territory and status (scale) of a great power, lost in 1945.
China, because of mass social discontent and ethnic separatism, is ready to solve its own internal problems by expansion of its political influence into the north first of all, and as far as possible, in the direction of the pacific. In the event of a collapse of Russian sovereignty - in the event of a third world war starting - China hopes on actively filling the ethnic vacuum in Siberia, in the Far East, yes and in Kazakhstan too, but here will hardly avoid the deep convulsions in the social sphere.
India is not against participation in the defeat of its traditional adversary - China.
Pakistan sees itself as a parent state dominant over Afghanistan and Central Asia, but at the same time participate with China in the collapse of the Indian polyethnic statehood.
Saudi Arabia, having gained championship in the Arab world besides Egypt, dreams to replace Iran in the status of the regional superpower.
And so on.
Russia in the event of the realization of US thoughts on the Middle East may turn out to be on edge of a catastrophe on the strength of the harmfulness of the administrative system inside the country.
The USA in this humanitarian collapse on the scale of an enormous region of the world saturated by people, besides the seizure of the richest oil-bearing deposits, plans to directly interfere in the internal affairs of Russia…
Thus, the USA is preparing to bring about world collapse for the sake of hiding the inevitable and indivertible default of its own system.
America declares a default to the whole world, believing that it possesses overwhelming military-political superiority. Characteristic of that so-called "leaking" of information already sends a message about scenario studying (at the level of the US government, State Department, the Pentagon, CIA and economic departments of the USA) for conducting a war against Iran. The solid bourgeois newspapers write about this. In September in the "The Sunday Times" an American expert on questions of national security from the Nixon Centre reported that the aim of the US plan consists in the absolute deprivation of the Iranian army of fighting efficiency for three days by carrying out air-strikes on already 1200 established targets. George Bush has elaborated that "this needs to be done while it is not too late".
Why is Bush in such a hurry? He hurrying also because time is running out for US impunity, for all the crimes committed by them.
The DPRK having created its own nuclear shield is no longer afraid of the American nuclear cudgel, which Bush waves around the whole world.
Seven Latin American states - Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Venezuela, Paraguay, Uruguay and Ecuador declared on October 10 their intention to form a joint Bank of the South, which will play a "central role in new financial architecture of the region" and will become the source of loans, alternatives to World Bank and International Monetary Fund. By forming their own bank, Latin American countries hope to limit the influence of the USA.
The Political Council of the Resistance has created in Iraq six anti-government Sunni groups, which in its Political program call for the liberation of Iraq "to free Iraq from foreign influence for achievement of full independence". The Program of the guerrillas is based on two main principles: on the non-acceptance of the illegal occupation that is carrying out oppression and aggression, contradicting Islamic traditions and - on religious right, as well as on the legitimacy of armed resistance with the aim of throwing out foreign troops from the country.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia– the Army of the People – FARC, in its Manifesto calls for unification and counter-action against the authorities, which are ruining the country that consist of drug barons-paramilitary mafia, latifundists and cattle breeders, drug-traffickers and businessmen, which by relying on troops of the government of North-American States have subjected Columbia to the hell of war. The Army of the People accuses the government of inhuman counter-insurgency strategies, which the CIA and FBI are involved in.
According to the information agency Sinihua "the wish for the USA to grab the rich oil-bearing region of Iran subsequent to the gangster-style hold up of Iraq and actual destruction of this country, forces the countries of the Middle East to be seriously worried about their own security and to undertake efforts in the direction of the development to their own nuclear industry that will wholly lead to the establishment of new nuclear powers in the Middle East. With appearance of a nuclear weapon in Iran, it could be built in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Turkey and Jordan would follow closely behind. In the opinion of the head of the Hashimit Kingdom "After this summer, everyone (in the region) is going to start racing for nuclear programs".
And such a policy of the countries of the Middle East is wholly logical and well-grounded: the sole form of self-defense from the state-terrorist USA today, lies in the possession by a country of a nuclear weapon. All other arguments are ineffective. Confirmation of this is in the armed aggressions by the USA together with partners (the European nuclear powers) on destroying Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq and constant threats until lately of pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the DPRK. If the DPRK had not created its own nuclear weapon and had not conducted nuclear testing and the testing of their own ballistic missiles capable of reaching the territory of the USA, it is quite possible that this imperialist predator would already have unleashed a war against the DPRK.
To remove the heightened tension in the world is possible not by way of banning the building by sovereign states of their own nuclear shield, but way of banning by the world community of US policy of international banditism and unleashing by force on sovereign states the so-called "US-style democracy" or – the forcible "democratization of the region". In order for the world to leave peacefully, it is necessary to put an end to the terrorism by the main imperialist power – the USA. It is namely the USA that has created across the whole world an enormous network of camps for the preparation of terrorists of different nationalities and races, which are trained by American instructors. The terrorists are financed by so-called NGO-s (non-governmental organizations) of the USA", behind which stand the US State Department. Chechnya – is a result of the functioning of American sponsor and fighters trained by US Special Forces.
As Fidel Castro says, "what kind of peace is this for the world, when the barbarous empire proclaims that it has a right to attack suddenly and preventively 70 or more countries, where it is capable of bringing death and destruction to any corner of the world, using the latest weapon technology and methods of killing? A world, where reigns the empire of cruelty and force, having hundreds of the military bases across the whole planet.
We shall fully defend on all tribunes of the world the right for people to produce nuclear fuel, defend without any fear and awe.”
On the example of the leading world empire – the USA, it is obvious that imperialism has exhausted itself as a social-political formation, that the USA objectively has arrived at the point where there is a need of a change in its social-political system. In certain political circles an opinion is widespread that an American "elite core " stands before the necessity of an anti-republican and anti-constitutional coup and transition to a charismatic dictatorship. It is no secret that in the US already at present, parallel power is really functioning. WHO really rules America today and the ideology of this “elite core" – more on this in

PART.2 of the report.


PART 2

WHO rules America today?

Ideology – this is a collection, a sum, a system of ideas and views, in which attitudes of people to reality, to one another, social problems and conflicts are realized and evaluated, as well as containing aims, programmes of social activity, directed at strengthening or altering (development) the given social relations. The condition of social classes, their root interests are reflected in the sphere of ideology.

IN CLASS SOCIETY, IDEOLOGY ALWAYS HAS A CLASS CHARACTER.

Marxist-Leninist ideology – is the scientific ideology of the working class, a holistic and developing system of philosophical, economic and social-political views. Marxist-Leninist ideology emerges as a revolutionary statement of new, higher forms of social structure. Marxism-Leninism today - this is Bolshevism.
Today, bourgeois ideology opposes Marxism-Leninism. The state ideology of the ruling class of the bourgeoisie of the imperialist superpower of the world – the USA, is aggressive Zionism.
Modern Zionism – is an extremely nationalistic, racist ideology. It is a policy and practice, expressing the interests of the major Jewish bourgeoisie, closely connected with the monopolistic bourgeoisie of imperialist states. The main content of modern Zionism - is aggressive chauvinism, racism, anti-communism and anti-Sovietism, the aim set on the conquest for world domination and establishing the so-called New World Order.
Fidel Castro, characterizing the modern world, noted that at the end of the Second World War, in which the people fought against fascism, there appeared a new power, dominating the world and unleashing the present absolutist and harsh order.

So WHAT is this new, parallel power (world’s shadow government) and its "elite core"?

The parallel secret government of high level, or the real, parallel power, its “elite core” – are Jewish bankers and manufacturers, which are 60 families, ruling the USA, openly located on Capital Hill in full view in the White House, US Congress, in 10 Downing Street, London (and in the British Parliament). These are servants of the World Government and the New World Order, it is an absolutely secret society, consisting of representatives of an untouchable ruling class, which include the Queen Elizabeth II of England, Queen of Netherlands, Queen of Denmark and royal families of Europe. After the Second World War, these aristocrats decided that for gaining power over the whole world, representatives of the aristocracy had to on a worldwide scale "share" with non-aristocratic but exceedingly strong leaders of the corporative business, and thus the doors of absolute power were open for those, who Queen Elizabeth II of England prefers to call "men of the common people".
The parallel power or, “elite core”, enters the Committee of 300, which comprises of at least 40 known branches in various countries of the world. This is a worldwide web of open and closed (clandestine and secret) organizations, as well as institutes, mass media and other structures, formed and run from a single centre.
All members of the Committee of 300 are members of Zionist organizations of America and other countries and also finance international Zionism not only in the USA, but also all over the world. It is namely they that define the policy of the UNITED STATES, remunerating and supporting statesmen that run alongside them on their lead, and displace (or physically remove) those who disagree with them…
Control of society is achieved on a broad scale by using the latest achievements reached in the field of the mass media and informatics. NATO, CIA and MOSSAD are all related to Committee of 300. "Young men and practically all agents of the MOSSAD are in a state of constant combat readiness. The MOSSAD has an enormous advantage over other intelligence services since there is “Jewish community" in every country of the world. There are thousands of large and small banks in the network of the Committee of 300.
Before the Second World War, Britain in essence, was the headquarters of world Zionism, with its ideas of suppression of national states. After 1945, the headquarters of world Zionism was relocated to the USA. It presently, apart from Israel, keeps the base position in the USA.
Under the Committee of 300, the so-called "Murder Agency" (in USA and in Europe) functions with a single aim – to execute the dictate of the Committee of 300 to murder high-ranking persons, when all other means of influencing them have been exhausted. Namely PERMINDEX headed by Sir William Stevenson, who for many years was the main agent of Queen Elizabeth II for the “struggle against saboteurs ", brought about the murder of Kennedy. It is not difficult to assume on whose orders Lady Diana was killed - a mother of legal heirs to the English throne.
We remember the murder of prime minister of Italy, Aldo Moro, which member of the Committee of 300 Henry Kissinger threatened, if Moro did not stop his plan for economic and industrial progress in Italy and did not allow the size of the population to fall. Aldo Moro was "kidnapped by the Red Brigades" and murdered. At court, stunning evidence was kept in the dark by reporters from the “Washington Post” and the “New York Times”. The murder of Aldo Moro averted obstacles to the plans of the Committee of 300 on destabilizing Italy and made it possible to realize the plans of the Committee of 300, 14 years after during the war in the Persian Gulf.
The President of Pakistan Ali Bhutto was killed by the same "command" because he wanted Pakistan to have its own nuclear weapons to counteract the constant threat from Israeli aggression in the Middle East. There is unassailable information that Kissinger also threatened Bhutto.
The Committee of 300 is also a Supreme controlling body, which controls the world for no less than a hundred years already.

HOW is power elected in America?

In 1974 the "American-Israeli committee on public relations" spent 400 thousand dollars for the election of representatives of the main Zionist organizations in the composition of the rulers on Capital Hill. In the flow of time, the money spent on election campaigns has grown incredibly.
The future president Clinton in his pre-election speeches in Washington and New York in "B’nai B’rith" - "Fathers of the Testament" (American Jewish masonic lodge, founded as far back as 1843) solemnly swore to high-ranking Jews that he would give them key posts in the government. Members of the American Jewish Congress gave 86% of votes to Clinton, hereunder the "Fathers of the Testament" supported Clinton. On his part, his pledge was also carried out. In the composition of the Administration of the president, 40 Jews entered from a total membership of the Administration of 71 people.
The "Fathers of the Testament" have in the USA enormous influence on internal and external policies. All statesmen of this country, proceeding in the execution of their own duties, invariably express "B’nai B’rith" their loyal feelings, and undertake to guard the interests of Israel. At present more than 900 lodges, covering more than 500 thousand people enter the masonic Jewish lodge "B’nai B’rith". This worldwide Zionist organization has more than 1 million people.
Madeleine Albright, or Marie Jan Kobralova, by birth is a Czech Jewess, and while being designated to the post of Secretary of State of the US under president Clinton - pledged publicly that NATO would steadily advance into the East to the borders of Russia". Today, this has already been carried out. In NATO already long ago, several versions of plans for conducting a war against Russia had been worked out
Such policy complies with the long-term program of the USA and the Worldwide Secret Government for world domination with the complete destruction of Russia’s military potential, in particular. Therefore, the wars initiated in the Balkans, to begin with - in Bosnia, afterwards - in Kosovo and Serbia - all this is part of the strategy of the West on crushing Yugoslavia and Russia as strongholds of Slavism.
The New World Order in the understanding of this by the Committee of 300 – is a deliverance of the planet from billions of "useless mouths", a rejection and destruction of firstly those people devoted to the "spirit of collectivism". Into this category fall first of all Slavonic nations, Chinese, North Koreans and a number of others.
The undermining of Christianity is an unshakable consequence of the realization of such a policy; the slow but steady destruction of the industrial national states; the destruction of hundreds of millions of people as "surplus population", as well as the removal of any leader who dares to stand in the way of the global planning by the Committee of 300 in achieving the above mentioned aims.
We shall recall 2003 in Iraq. The Committee of 300 has made from Iraq a horrible significant show, so that other small countries do not try to decide their own destiny themselves.
After the barbaric bombing of Iraq and its actual destruction, president Bush ordered the shooting in stress of many thousand Iraqi soldiers in a column of armoured vehicles under white flags, returning to Iraq in accordance with the Geneva Convention "About the agreement on the separation of the troops and their withdrawal from combat ". It is truthfully known that Bush had got the mandate for this vandalism directly from the Committee of 300.
The "objective" mass media of the West did not even bat an eyelid in reaction to this vandalism.
Indo-European people if they want to be free and happy, preserve their own states from disintegration, dismemberment and liquidation of their own nation, must answer the question put by Hamlet – To Be or Not To Be.
The fate of many civilizations on Earth depends on the answer to this question.
The USA needs Israel not only as a faithful dog in the fight against Arabs in the Middle East. The USA needs Israel also for camouflaging its own criminal policy, covering itself up, ostensibly, with obligations about protection of the interests of Israel. Israel is also a place for cover from the law and criminal responsibility of bankers and businessman of Jewish origin, who have been caught stealing in the country of their residence.
They always manage come out of the water dry because, as Gusinsky replied to this question – who a businessman, in the past the owner of Russian TV channel NTV says: Firstly, Israel – is a place, to where it is possible for any Jew to run in order to escape prison; Secondly, no matter what we would have done, we would have always been vindicated by "New York Times" and "NTV".
The Zionists have committed many crimes in the last 50 years. Nowadays, the Jewish elite of the USA is pushing the world towards Apocalypse to place the Zionists in a position to rule the world.

WHY are the people of the world not actively rising up to fight against madmen, suffering with the delusion of grandeur, against the common evil of mankind - international Zionism – the shock force of American imperialism. WHY?

Today everybody knows that whoever owns the mass media, owns the world, since he owns public opinions, because he forms this very public opinion, forms the results of any voting ("corrects", or garbles, or will assign to the adding machine the necessary numeric version of those voting "in favour of").
Wealthy Englishman Moses Montefiori pointed out the power of the mass media 100 years ago, when speaking to his fellow-believers: "While we do not have the world’s press in our own hands, everything that you do will be in vain. We must be gentlemen of the newspapers of the whole world or at least have over them enough influence to have the chance to blind and cloud people’s minds".
"The Jewish elite today control the only superpower – the USA and its atomic launch platform all over the world, in the Middle East, Far East and the North East, on the whole territory, girding Russia. The question of HOW it manages to rule, break the laws of the functioning of the world community, commit outrages against “non-Jews” - and with all this rouse a feeling of compassion and pity towards itself?
This task has been masterly solved by American Jews. "The top echelons of this super-rich, influential and powerful commune pumps money from Swiss, Germans, Americans, Russia, and rules America and the world, promotes crimes against humanities in Israel, defines the dollar rate and at the same time, supports its image of a people unhappy, wretched, offended and persecuted, with the help of the simple but effective means – the propaganda machine of the HOLOCAUST" - thus writes the American Jewish scientist and dissident professor of the New-York university, Norman Finkelstein in his book "The Holocaust Industry".
"Before 1967, noone in the world was interested in the death of Jews during the days of the Second World War. In 1967 Israel seized the Golan Heights and the American Jews began to unfurl their propagandistic apparatus of the Holocaust. With its help, they began to defend and justify their breaches of human rights on the territory occupied by Israel. In other words, they used a skilled and refined propagandistic manoeuvre”.
.
Under the noise of this constantly increasing unfurling propaganda campaign appears the angry speech by George Bush "About the axis of evil", written by speechwriter-Zionist David Frum, who before this specialized on the fight against "anti-Semitism". Another Zionist, Wolfowitz, practically headed the US Armed Forces. Leading Zionist thinker Norman Podgorets openly calls for war. The most "liberal-minded" attorney-Zionist Alan Dershowitz propagates the use of torture as the most reliable way of getting to the truth. (We remember the noise in the progressive press about the use of mockery, humiliating human dignity and the use of sadistic tortures against Iraqi prisoners of war on part of the American prison overseers in the Abu Graib prison, the barbaric tortures in the closed prison in Guantanamo Bay. And also the “nomadic” secret prisons on US military planes flying around the whole world with people only suspected of being involved in "terrorism"?

The HOLOCAUST. The more the Palestinians of the Gaza perished from Israeli weapons in the Palestine-Israeli conflict, the louder yelled American Jews about the Nazi gas chambers used in the Second World War. Israel and the HOLOCAUST became pillars of a new Jewish religion in the USA, substituting the dilapidated Old Testament for itself. Thereafter, the "process was underway": The wealth of American Jews and their influence in the state apparatus and press of the USA has grown. 30% of the richest people of America, 30% of ministers and bankers, 20% university professors and 50% leading lawyers- are Jews. Around half of Wall Street capital belongs to Jews.
"The legend about the constantly persecuted people and the terrible HOLOCAUST became required not only for protection of Israel from reprobation by the world community for its criminal policy on the Middle East (Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq), but also for the protection, in a broader sense, of Jewish wealthy people and oligarchs from criticism. One only needs to say a word against the Jew-crook, and the press belonging to the Jews immediately raises to combat position the shadow of Auschwitz".



What are the real numbers of Jews killed in the holocaust in comparison with the human loss endured in the Second World War by other peoples of the world?

In the fight against fascism in the Second World War, mankind gave up 55 million lives, and out of them 22 million were Russian, Ukrainian, Belorussians (the losses at the front amounted to 8.7 million, peaceful people -13 million), Germans - 13 million (at the front 7.9 million), the USA - 405 thousand, Great Britain - 375 thousand, French – 500 thousand, Jews - 500 thousand according to the Encyclopedia of 1952. Nothing about the 3 million, which is now stated in the Jewish Encyclopedia, and more so about the 6 million victims of the holocaust, which is not in any of the sources based on archive data and historical documents.
The heaviest losses, as we can see, were sustained by the Soviet people, but no groans, moans or eternal weeping about that are ever heard.
Now in Germany, Austria, Portugal, Spain, Denmark, Holland, Switzerland and France, the Jews have succeeded in adopting a law that chastises people for the slightest doubt that 6 (!) million Jews died from the Holocaust.
The Russian State Duma (Lower House of Parliament has rejected a draft law that envisages strict punishment for denial or crude underestimation of the crimes of fascism against Jews in the years of the last world war. The Jews see this fact as proof of growing anti-Semitism in Russia.
A document, law, was leaked to the press signed by George Bush on October 16 2004 year, under the heading – the "Global Anti-Semitism Review Act". This law founds a special division under a state department of the USA for reviewing acts of anti-Semitism worldwide and preparing annual reports about them for Congress. Below is the list of the ideas or actions, which the US government considers to be anti-Semitic:
1. Any statement about "Jews controlling the government, mass media, international business and world finance".
2. "Hard anti-Israeli beliefs".
3. "Sharp criticism" of the present or past leadership of Israel is anti-Semitic. The US state department considers images of the swastika in cartoons condemning the behaviour of present or past Zionist leaders to be anti-Semitic. (For instance, a cartoon with a swastika, criticizing Ariel Sharon for his inhumane attack on the West Bank of Jordan, accompanied by a shower of rockets – an "infernal fire" on helpless Palestinians, women and children, is anti-Semitic. Like the word “Zion-nazism” when describing the blanket bombing of Lebanon by Sharon in 1982, during which perished 17.5 thousand innocent refugees.
4. Criticism of the Jewish religion, their religious leaders or literature (particularly Talmud, Shulhan-Aruha and Kabbalah).
5. Criticism of the US government and Congress that they are found under the overwhelming influence of Jews (including the Committee of American-Israeli public relations).
6. The Criticism of Jewish-Zionist forces for the propaganda of globalism (the "New world order").
7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers in instigating the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
8. Assertion that victims of the Holocaust amounted to less than 6 million people.
9. Defining Israel as a “racist” state.
10. Assertion of the existence of a “Zionist conspiracy"
11. Assertion that Jews and their leaders brought about the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917.
12. "Offensive statements about Jews"
13. Non-recognition of Jews of the biblical right to the seizure of Palestine.
14. Assertion that the Israeli intelligence took part in preparing the attack on September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Centre in New York.

We think that there is no point in commenting on this outrageous "document".

Zionists are masterly agent provocateurs. By their own actions and policy in stirring up anti-Semitism, they lead an intensive and never-ending fight against anti-Semitism. The Anti-Defamation League deals specifically with this (founded in 1913) (Defamation - is slander, discrediting, publicly spreading information that undermines the reputation of anyone, or anything). The ADL uses the tactic of persecution of anti-Semites, suppression of any dissidence by means of the policy - "Israel first of all", conducted by Washington. The usual methods are – the removal of critics of Zionist tactics.
The ADL has its national headquarters in New York with a good budget and 28 regional branches located across the whole of America. Each regional branch has its own rules, consisting of leaders and "well-known people". By expression of leading Jewish historian Liliental, they all apply "enormous pressure, often to the point of blackmail". The ADL not only conducted direct campaigns against liberal figures, labeling them as anti-Semites, but also spread amongst Jewish heads of universities of the USA a blacklist of professors, which it considered to be anti-Semites. A large number of moderate Jewish highbrows and their associations came out in protest against this action by the ADL.
About the unity of the Jewish race, Jewish nation and "community of origin of the modern Jewish population".

By definition of J.V.STALIN, "A nation is a historically established firm community of people, appearing on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life and specific psychic character, appearing in a common culture… It is necessary to emphasize that none of specified signs, taken separately, is sufficient for defining a nation. Moreover, it is sufficient that there be an absence of at least one of these signs, that a nation ceases to be a nation" (J.V.STALIN, Vol .2, p. 297- Russian).
In the composition of the modern Jewish population of the world there exist a number of groups, which even by its own anthropological data and racial signs, it is impossible to refer to a Jewish race. Others - by language, culture and residence in different countries of the world, as permanent citizens, had long ago assimilated with the local population and therefore forfeited their attribute to a Jewish nation. These are the Sefards, (Jews-North Africans), Ashkenazi - European Jews (Germans, French, etc), Chinese Jews (Kaifeng), Ethiopian Jews (Falashi) and others. From here – the invalidity of the statement of the Zionists about the belonging of all Jews to one so-called "worldwide Jewish race or Jewish nation".
The notion of anti-Semitism, if by this is meant a negative attitude towards Jews – is obviously not lawful in the terminological sense, when this notion is used in connection with the "Jewish question", the Jewish problem, since Jews – are only a part of a large community of people called Semites. Not just Jews, but arabs of Maroc, Algiers, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Palestine, Jordans, Saudi Arabia, Syrias, Iraq, Yemen and others countries, much of the population to Ethiopia and Eritrei, as well as many others, living on the Mediterranean coast and the Caucasus are Semites.
If one talks about anti-Semitism, then it is namely the Israelis and Americans who exceed anyone in their anti-Semitism when we remember their military aggression against Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine and Iraq accompanied by a greater loss amongst the peaceful population. And indeed the people of these countries are mainly Semites.
Now one of the main tasks of any dialogue between Israel and the civilized world is the need for them to prove that there is no difference between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism whatsoever. The foreign secretary of Israel spoke about this idea as far back as 1973. But Zionism is an ideology, and Semitism is an attribute to a certain community of people. Zionists try to put a equal sign of identity where it is groundless (absurd), since they are equalizing notions, which are completely different in both significance and sense.

Let us analyse the essence of Zionism and its policy towards Arabs.

Why has there been no solution to the Palestinian question for more than 60 years?
Why can’t the Palestinians, having legal right to the land of Palestine, and hitherto cannot peacefully live on it and build its own Palestinian state?
Why has the Palestinian question for already more than 60 years been hemorrhaging, and there is still no end in sight of this disaster for the Palestinians?
The reason for such a situation lies in the aggressive, land grabbing, nazi policy of the racist, Zionist state of Israel.
The 30th session of the UN General Assembly (November 1975) qualified Zionism as a form of racism and racial discrimination.
Aggressive racism itself is still not fascism. It becomes fascism when it becomes the state ideology. Jewish Nazism - Zionism, as the state ideology of Israel, is the modern-day form of fascism.
Orthodox Judaism is the theoretical and political basis of Zionism – the state religion of Israel - the most anti-human of all religions existing in the world, many of which are over two thousand years old. Judaism – is a religion of racism and anti-humanism.
The Code of religious Jewish laws - "Shulkhan Arukh" – is the basis of the policy of the ruling class of the imperialist bourgeoisie, the Zionists of the whole world. After having compared the "Shulkhan Arukh" with the real policy of Israel and the USA, as well as with the handwriting of the activity of Zionist organizations all over the world, you will find a surprising resemblance between them. From the "100 laws of Talmud" we shall cite only a few, as follows:
-"Passing by a ravaged temple of an Akuma, every Jew is obliged to pronounce: "Glory to You, Lord that You have rooted out thence this house of idols".
When a Jew sees a well-built house of an Akuma, he must say:
- "Destroy the houses of the haughty, Lord ", but when he sees the rubble of the house of an Akuma, he must pronounce:
- "Lord is the God of vengeance”.
On state holidays, when is forbidden to work and cook food, "one may when preparing a meal for oneself, add to the pot of meal some food for the dogs, since we are obliged to allow dogs to live too. Preparing food for an Akuma is strictly forbidden, since we are not obliged to allow him to live".
- The money of an Akuma is good, not belonging to anyone, and therefore the first person who wants it, has the full right to possess this money. The property of a Christian is considered by Jews as good, not belonging to anyone,
- Jews can take as much as they can seize.
- A Jew can defraud an Akuma, since they are worse than dogs.
- Children of an Akuma are worse than even illegitimates or idiots of Jewish origin.

Like in justification of their anti-human policies in respect of Arabs, leading Jewish historian Liliental writes: "…. The need for preserving group solidarity of people living scattered amongst someone else, created the need for the use of the double moral approach: one for relations amongst "us" and another - towards them".

The State religion of the Israel is Judaism
What God do Israelis is pray to?

In his work "To the Jewish question K. Marx wrote:
"Money – is the jealous god of Israel, before a person of which there must be no other god. Money topples down all gods of a person from the heights, and turns them into goods. Money – is the common, formed as something independent, value of all things. It thus has deprived the whole world - both the human world, and nature – of their own value. Money – this is the alienated from people essence of their labour and their existence; and this alien essence commands people, and people worship it.
The god of Jews has been made worldly, has become the world god. The bill of exchange – is the real god of Jews. His god – is only an illusory bill of exchange.
Their outlook on nature, formed under the rule of private property and money, is true contempt towards nature, the practical humiliation of it; although nature also exists in Jewish religion, it is in imagination only.
In this sense, Thomas Muntzer acknowledged as unbearable, "that the entire creature has turned into private property – the fish in the water, the birds in the air, the plants on the land; after all the creature must be free (the pamphlet Muncer, 1524, see K. Marx reference 99 Vol.1, Russian)".


"…Even attitudes connected with the continuation of the human race, relations between man and woman etc, become an object of trade! Women here – are objects of purchase and sale.
"The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, in general, a money person".
“ The essence of the modern Jew we find not only in the Pentateuch or in the Talmud, but also in modern society, - not as abstract, but as in high measure empirical essence, not only as a limitation of the Jew, but also as Jewish limitation of society.
As soon as society is able to abolish the empirical essence of Jewishness and its prerequisites, the Jew will become impossible, for his consciousness will not have a bigger object, for the subjective basis of Jewishness, practical need, will become humanized, for the conflict between individual-perceptible being of man and his generic being will be abolished.
The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Jewishness".
(K.MARKS and F.ENGELS, Comp. 2 pub, Vol.1, pp.410-413, Russian).

From the above said by K. Marx, it turns out that to put an end to nazi ideology - Zionism, is possible in only one way – with the destruction of private ownership and money itself. This is possible under communism. Namely with this, I suppose, one can explain the pathological hatred of Zionists towards socialism and communism, in this they have exceeded German fascism.

Judaism not only tries to consolidate Jews into one nation, but also to put them in opposition to all the rest of the people, and forces them to look upon all non-Jews (Goyas or Gentiles) as their own enemy and aims at never ceasing the fight with all the rest of mankind.

In Israel operates a system of laws, legally reinforcing the position of the semi-slaves condition of non-Jews in the system of the Jewish state.
In Israel up to this day there is no constitution where the rights of the people are guaranteed.
The Palestinian in Israel can be shot if he expresses disgruntlement with his condition as a person without rights. An Arab’s house in Israel can taken away from him in order to settle Jews there who have arrived from other points of the globe.
Speaking at a session of the UN in 1971, Y.A. Malik, Soviet representative to the UN, voiced the standpoint of the Soviet delegation on Zionism.
"Like the fascists, the Zionists are of one and the same ideological nature; and that and other – they both express the interests of the major imperialist and most reactionary bourgeoisie; and they are both mortal enemies of the revolutionary and national-liberation movement, enemies of socialism and communism; and one and the other – are raving mad racists. The difference is only in that the German fascists created the cult of the "Aryan race” and the Zionists are trying to create the cult of the "Jewish master race". This is the only difference between them".
Being acquainted with "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion ", which were widespread in the west, Hitler said: "Two peoples cannot be the chosen one simultaneously. Presently, we are God's chosen people…Two worlds have entered into conflict! The people of God and the people of Satan! The Jews - are enemies of the human race – they are anti-human. The Jew - is a creation of another god. He has grown from another root of mankind. The Aryan and the Jew: I place them against each other; and if the first I call a human being, then the second I must name otherwise. They are so distant from each other, as animals are distant from people. But this does not mean that I want to call the Jew an animal .He is still further away from animal, than we – Aryans; the Jew is an essence, distant from nature and hostile towards nature".
For practical purposes, Hitler armed himself from "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", political intrigue, the techniques of conspiracy, reactionary degradation, camouflage and fraudulent maneuvers.
Israeli writer Shamir in his book, appealing to its readers, poses a question:
"What, personally speaking, did we not like about German Nazis? The racism? We have it no less".
The Jerusalem Russian newspaper “Pryamaya Ryech" (Straight Talk) conducted a poll amongst "Russian" Jews, who emigrated from Russia to Israel, about their attitude towards Palestinians. Here are some of the answers:
- I want to kill all Arabs,
- All Arabs should be killed,
- An Arabs should be banished from here, the gates closed behind them and locked,
- An Arab – is an Arab. They should be smashed.
We were against racism while it was against us. We were against Nazism while this was someone else’s Nazism. We were against the zondercommand –punitive troop units consisting of murdering butchers, only while they were someone else’s. Our own, native Jewish punitive troops make us happy".
"We were against the ghetto, when we were penned in ghetto. Now, we are the most "liberal" Jewish people".
"Today our tanks kill the peaceful population, destroy their homes, starve and keep under blockade millions of people. But our singers extol the glorious Jewish fighters, the reliable hand and sharp-eye of the Jewish sniper, the exorbitant humanism of the Jewish people, which could transform all Goyas of Palestine into mincemeat, but is limited to only a several wounded a day".
Israel today – is the only country in the world, where death quads officially operate, where only most recently Supreme Court limited the use of torture...
The Palestinian cannot go even to a nearby village without a permit, not passing the procedure of searching and checking documents. He cannot even dream about a trip to the sea several kilometers from his home.
Jews protested against "discrimination" at work and in high school when they lived in the USSR. "Therefore everything we Jews in Russia spoke of needs to be rewritten in reverse light". "Presently, we have created a system of total national discrimination. In our state Electric company, out of 13 thousand workman - only 6 are Goyas, or 0,0004%. Goyas form 40% of the population of the country from Jordan up to the sea, but only one in four has a right to vote. There is not one Goya in the Supreme Court, in government, in the top brass of the army, in aviation, or in management of the secret services. Not one Goya works for the editorial board of the main Israeli newspaper. We fought not for human rights, but for Jewish rights.
Seeing a miserable child raising his hands in front of a machine gunner upsets us only in one way - that this could be a Jewish child. They can shoot as many children of the Goyas as they want".
6 million people live in Israel. Of them - 75% are Jews - That is what the Jews assert. NO! In Israel live 9 million people, of them - Jews make up a little over half of that (!) But Jews are not happy with this result.
"We want 80% of Jews, therefore 3 million Goyas do not count. They are not counted by us. Somehow they go uncounted because we are a Jewish country. They have their own autonomy". (Its inhabitants have no voting rights and have a no right to leave the autonomy; this is some kind of "zone").
We note that in the book published in 2001 in Moscow, by the Congress of Jewish Religious Organizations and Associations of Russia (CJROAR) "Kitzur Shulkhan Arukh" – a shortened publication of the Judaic code of law obligatory to all Jews, Goyas (non-Jews or Gentiles) are already not treated as live-stock, but as excrement.
The problem of Palestinian refugees exists for already 50 years. But none of them are thinking about returning home. It only took Clinton to say by chance that Palestinians can live where they want, for the Jewish lobby to attack him - and it did go quiet until he renounced his own words.
Zionist and Nazi ideology unites the concept of continuity of the historical process. Zionists substantiate their own right to Palestine by their existence there of a Jewish state several thousand years ago, and the Nazi Reich passed itself off as the successor to the so-called. "Holy Roman Empire of the German nation".
If the German fascists used their military power for enslaving people, then modern fascists-Zionists widely use the power of money, gained on the backs of robbing the people of the world, buying up the greedy and mercenary.
"Zionism – is a karma of western civilization, which it wants to replace others with".
"Zionism – is a parasite on liberalism, and on its falsehoods there lies a direct call to violence and evil. This is provoked by liberalism, its weakness and false humanism, anti-human openness. And this is revenge, commanding over all the rest, elevating to the absolute.
"Zionism – is the recognition of an endless distance between the absolute and mankind, and the involvement in the absolute is only small circle of chosen people, who have on account of this right, boundless rule in relation to the "cattle", on account of using unseen secret forms of struggle by way of its introduction in different spheres of social life of other peoples and degrading them from within.

"Zionism – is the kingdom of darkness, this is the assertion of the primary of darkness in relation to light. And this is a black final of history" (in our opinion - for imperialism and its criminal, human-hating state ideology - Zionism).

The attempt by the Zionists to "forget" about the class nature of any class society

World experience bears witness that the national question has always had a concrete-historic content.
The attempt by the Zionists to unite all Jews on rights to them belonging to a united master race and is a nations chosen by God pursues one aim – the struggle of the major Jewish bourgeoisie for world domination. But after all, in class society, which Israel is, along with the USA, there are antagonistic, irreconcilable classes – the bourgeoisie and its gravedigger - the proletarians, beside which interests and aims are diametrically opposed. Jewish bankers, large businessmen - a tiny minority even on the scale of the Jewish nation itself. Therefore, the idea of gaining on behalf of the Jewish proletariat their own assistants in the fight for world domination of the Jewish bourgeoisie, is an empty idea first of all and absolutely bankrupt, which can never be realized in practice. The Jewish working class together with progressive Jewish intellectuals, the works of which, in particular, I used when preparing this report - will not support the bourgeoisie neither in the USA, nor in Israel. The fact that this is exactly the way it is, is indicated by the strikes amongst Jewish office employees (and workers) in the USA, and in Israel itself. The class struggle in class society cannot be substituted by a sniveling fairytale about unity of the Jewish nation or any other (nation) under the false slogan of - a nation higher than anything.
The claims by world Zionism to world domination will inevitably suffer complete collapse, like recent history has already shown with the " Great Third Reich" of Adolf Hitler.
Therefore all of us proletarians, rural workers, laboring intellectuals, and everyone who is subjected to the oppression of the ruling class of the bourgeoisie, must, regardless of their race, nation, beliefs, fight together against the common enemy of mankind - international Zionism - the state ideology of Israel and the USA, rising up threateningly towards world domination.
We, people of the earth, must actively rise up against the plans of American imperialism for globalization of the whole world and establishment of an American-style New World Order - the subservience to itself of everyone and the destruction of those states, which are declared by the USA as a "zone of national interests" of this predator.
We must achieve peace on Palestinian land and a solution to the problem with support of the UN on the building by Arabs of their own sovereign Arab Palestinian state.
Zionism is a kingdom of darkness. This kingdom darkness must be destroyed in the name of light and good on the planet, destroyed by way of socialist revolution - the inevitable flow of history. If this does not happen, then civilization will cease to exist.
Long live the unity of the struggle of all people of the world for independence in the choice of the way for their own historic development, for independence and peace world all over the world!

Death to American-Israeli Zionism as a human-hating ideology of the ruling class of the imperialist bourgeoisie of the USA and Israel!

People of Goodwill, Workers of all Countries, Unite!

Quoted main sources (except specified in text)

1. John Coleman, "Committee 300" ( "Secret world government"), translation from English 3rd publication, M.,"Vityaz",2003 Doctor John Coleman - a former employee of the British special services, many years devoted himself to the study of the so-called systems of global management and checking the known by many as the "new world order". Possessing access to secret documents not only of British investigation, John Coleman in his book, analyses the activity of American society from within, the society, being a citadel and axis of the whole Western imperialist world. Practically acting as a secret power, striving to world domination, not clinging to unabiding forms and organising structures. For them the Committee of 300 and multiple organizations that enter it and checked by him, are a screen, suitable and a well-timed form of the entailment of their own inhuman thoughts. The invulnerability of this secret power (world Zionism), as history shows, consists just in small changes of the external forms of concrete life with reference to, social-political condition.
2. Norman Finkelstein,"Holocaust Industry" New York 2004.
3. "Shulhan Aruh" (in translation - "Covered Table"), "One hundred laws from Talmud" - a scientific study of the doctor Кarl Ekkera in translation Alexey Shmakova (the baptized Jew, therefore surname is Russian) book "Jewish speech", izd.1897, the publishers Mamontova A.M., Moscow, Mamontova House.
"Shulkan Aruh" was formed by rabbi Joseph Karo (1488 - 1577) from the Palestinian city Shafet. The Karo systematized the laws of the Talmud and reduced them to one hundred laws. "Shulkan Aruh" is deeply honored among Jews and operating around the world (regardless of country of residence) by legal code of laws, obligatory for every Jew.
We used one chapter from the book by A.S.SHMAKOV - "Jewish mirror" at the light of the truth, published in the book "One hundred laws from Talmud", M., "Vityazi",1998
4. "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion ". Under Napoleone II of France, in Paris the Worldwide Jewish Alliance was created - " Alliance Israelite Universelle" (AIU) - a forerunner to the Worldwide Zionist Organization. The common meeting of AIU elected the Central Committee out of 30 members with Netter at the head. In 1863 Isaak Adolf Kremie (1796 - 1880) was elected president. Towards this time pertains and the appearance of the "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", which were signed by Zionist representatives of the 33rd degree initiations.
In 1897 Minister of the interior to the Russian empire T.GROMYKIN and Minister of finance Earl S.V.VITTE sent to Basel to the First Worldwide Congress of Zionists their secret agent Johnson-Khan. The latter managed steal from the briefcase of Theodor Herzl - an Austrian journalist, one of the ideologues of Zionism, three copies of the text of the "Protocols" in French, German languages and in Hebrew. On field of the French text was the mark of Herzl’s hand: "Faire rapport aux anciens des Sion" i.e. - "read the report about old man Zion". Khan, on return to Petersburg, sent the material to his chiefs, who ordered to direct the text in Hebrew to SANKT-PETERSBURG spiritual academy for translation into Russian. The translation was made, and in 1898 Russian officials already, having access to secret information, were able to get acquainted with the text "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" and ensure the identity of all three texts.
"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion " accidentally fell into the hands of S.A. NILUS and he had courage to have them published accompanied with his own commentaries. S.A.NILUS could not be but the falsifier of the manuscript, since it existed for many years before he did, nor a mystifier since before him the “Protocals” had already been published in Petersburg, Moscow, and twice in Thulium. Nilus was the fifth publisher though the most solid narrator and researcher of the text.
The most important information about the “Protocols" is contained in notarial notorized evidence of 1935 – 1936 to the Bern Court of Colonel N.F.PRINCEV (Sofia) and E.ENGELIGARD (Riga). From these documents it follows that governmental circles to Russia as far back as 1890 year were aware of the existence of the “Protocols” and had decided to check it. HOW? – as is said above.
5. Israel Shamir. "Master of Discourse. American-Israeli terrorism". М.,2003
6. L.A. Modzhoryan "International Zionism at the service of imperialist reaction: legal aspect". M., "International relations" 1984.

N.A.ANDREEVA
GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE AUCPB (ALL-UNION COMMUNIST PARTY OF BOLSHEVIKS)










________________________________________